Future of Vaccines: Eating a Salad?
A disturbing report just came my way informing me that legislators in Tennessee and Arizona appear to be preparing their states for the addition of edible vaccines to their food supply. Neither of the bills prohibit vaccines from being added to food. Rather, they accept the addition as inevitable.
Now wait a minute, aren’t we being told that this technology isn’t yet available? This goes to show that you can’t listen to their words, but you have to watch their actions. Something rotten is afoot and it has a big pharma smell to it.
Legislators seem weary of pharmaceutical company pressure and now they’re giving in to the inevitability that this technology will make it into our food suppy? I don’t buy it. To me it seems that these legislators have been bought and paid for by outside interests, meaning there is no more effective government oversight or protection for the public on this issue. It also means we’re very close to having these edible vaccines dumped into our food supply.
What Are Edible Vaccines?
Edible vaccines are a type of vaccine made by genetically modifying plants to produce a specific antigen or protein that is supposed to stimulate an immune response in the body. The idea is that people can eat the modified plants, and their bodies will recognize the protein as foreign and develop immunity to a particular disease.
Currently, there is said to be no edible vaccines that have been approved by regulatory agencies, such as the US FDA, due to their classification as genetically engineered crops. However, the University of California, Riverside has already “perfected” vaccinating lettuce, and the University of California, Berkeley, has also conducted similar tests on tomatoes. The technology is so close to being implemented that lawmakers are already drafting bills for its introduction into foods.
Similarly, according to a 2020 article from the National Institutes of Health's National Library of Medicine website, there is tactic admission that the gene-encoding bacterial or viral disease-causing agent can be incorporated into plants without losing its immunogenic genetic properties.
So yes, I think they can already turn edible plants into mRNA “vaccine factories” in a similar fashion to how COVID-19 vaccines employed messenger RNA or mRNA technology to battle infectious disease. There’s no other reason for the introduction of “consumer protection bills” right now. Watch for more states, and more countries, to adopt these bills soon.
But given what we know about the horrific effects of the Covid-19 vaccine, this does not bode well for consumers.
So the main challenge isn’t whether this can actually happen, but its acceptance by the population. The idea is to distract and deflect from what we saw during the Covid crisis and introduce another set of lies about how this technology is so much safer, with added benefits, cost effectiveness and efficiency, even though it’s the same genetic mRNA technology.
If you’ve taken the Covid shot and haven’t experienced any side effects, you’re fortunate. You’ll have to think deeply about this technology though. The rationale is that vaccines in plants will eventually replace traditional counterparts completely. "Ideally, a single plant would produce enough artificial mRNA nanoparticles to vaccinate a single person," said Juan Pablo Giraldo, an associate professor in UCR's Department of Botany and Plant Science who is heading up research in conjunction with other scientists from the University of California San Diego and Carnegie Mellon University.
All of this assumes every consumer wants to be continually vaccinated. By “continual,” I mean every time you eat. What’s the limit of vaccine the human body can ingest before terrible health effects take place? These madmen believe that most people will be convinced to take this genetically modified medicine if it looks more like a food as opposed to a metal syringe. And believe me, they’ll do everything within their power to achieve this goal.
Is this the reason why GMO/vaccine investor Bill Gates is buying up farmland across the United States? Will all current vaccines and hundreds of future vaccine experiments be carried out through the food supply?
This type of experiment could forever alter our food supply, turning healthy foods into bio-warfare playgrounds that globalists can use to exploit human health. It’s not about combating disease, as they say, but about making everyone on earth dependant on medicine.
What About Animals?
Vaccines have been used on the animals that we eat as far back as 1879, according to a paper by the Livestock Research Innovation Corporation.
Chances are, you've eaten food from vaccinated animals! Farmers give animals shots to keep them from contracting diseases. For example, chickens might get 3-8 shots, depending on if they lay eggs or become meat chickens. Cows get more (up to 8!), while pigs usually get three shots.
Even “organically” grown animals are vaccinated. For food to be labeled organic, federal law requires that the vaccines given are USDA approved. Importantly, “free-range” animals are also vaccinated because their roaming often exposes them to diseases carried by wildlife.
But now we’re getting into genetically modified vaccines. In Canada, there is already an approved mRNA vaccine available for swine. What about evidence of safety? “There haven't been studies on the side effects of humans eating animals that have been vaccinated with an mRNA vaccine”, Shayan Sharif with the Ontario Veterinary College in Guelph, Canada says, “but there's no evidence to show that there would be any side effects.”
So no studies of harm have been done, yet we are supposed to simply believe experts who desperately want to get ahead of the mRNA vaccine conversation? Sharif says, “[The public] need to be educated because there's the fear factor that could be introduced because of disinformation or misinformation”.
That’s why they don’t want evidence to come out. To them it’s all misinformation and disinformation—on the side of the ignorant consumer. Whether it’s true that this technology is already being used or is on the doorstep, the global agenda to battle vaccine hesitancy by inoculating every man, woman and child is coming straight to your dinner plate.
And how would edible vaccines be regulated? Clearly there are two separate actions at play: One for the food providing nutrition and the other assisting the immune system (supposedly) to fight a virus. Should be foods be regulated as a food, a vaccine, a take-home drug, or another combination product of its own?
These are proper questions on a confusing and potentially deadly issue. Below it’s being discussed by Tennessee lawmakers:
Deliberate Evasion of Safety Protocols
Let’s be honest, adding vacciness to our food supply represents a deliberate evasion of established safety protocols. Not only for adults, but even more so for minors who don’t provide informed consent. What about the lack of long-term safety data for genetically modified products? Without that this is nothing more than human experimentation without consent or public safety in mind. Have we forgotten Operation Warp Speed, the vaccine acceleration program? Do we remember the excess deaths, the untold injuries and suffering?
In the United States, companies are typically held responsible if their products cause harm. However, there's an exception for vaccines. The government argues that vaccines are crucial for national security, and they reason that even though a small number of people might experience side effects, the overall benefit to public health outweighs that risk. So, unlike most products, vaccine manufacturers are generally protected from lawsuits if someone gets hurt by their vaccines.
That makes them arrogant, calling the vaccine hesitant consumer irrational and pseudoscientific, while stating that vaccines are 100% safe and effective. However, the real dangers have been habitually covered up. I see no discernible change in “expert” attitude with edible vaccines. Once they’re out in the public, denial and “lack of proof” will be the common refrain, with the poor consumer getting the short end of the health stick once again.
You can fight back by getting involved in community gardens or growing produce on your own property. If enough people refuse to buy this garbage and cause economic repercussions, they’ll be forced to end this charade.
Your presence here is greatly valued. If you've found the content interesting and useful, please consider supporting it through a paid subscription. While all our resources are freely available, your subscription plays a vital role. It helps in covering some of the operational costs and supports the continuation of this independent, unbiased research and journalism work. Please make full use of our free library.
If shy about commitments, feel free to leave a one time tip!